Jump to content

Houston19514

Subscriber
  • Posts

    8,942
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

Everything posted by Houston19514

  1. There is a nonprofit called Trees for Houston that I am sure would welcome your help and contributions.
  2. Post the loan extension document here. Or are you only interested in driving traffic to your own website?
  3. All of that is true, but not necessarily dispositive. You are probably right that Brookfield won't do anything soon; however, if they come across a strong anchor or anchors that want space in a new tower, they will not hesitate to build, regardless of the vacancies in their existing buildings. FWIW: Chevron just extended their lease in Continental Center 1 or whatever it is called now for 311,000 square feet, so presumably they are vacating or already have vacated 150,000 sq feet.
  4. I found this intriguing, so I did the calculations this afternoon. The result: the population growth in inner loop Houston is almost insignificant in the context of the overall metro growth. The total population growth inside the loop was only 13,028. Even if we loook only at the growing side of the inner loop (the west side -- west of the North Freeway, west of the South Freeway and including the CBD), the net growth was only 29,704. That is only 20% of the city's population growth and less than 2.5% of the total metro population growth. (For every additional person added to the west inner loop during the decade, we added 39 additional people elsewhere in the metro area.)
  5. According to Wikipedia, the St. Lukes Tower in Tokyo is 47 stories -- 221 meters tall (and calling it "twin-towered" is a bit misleading... there are two towers, but they are at best fraternal twins, with one's growth having been severely stunted... a mere 146 meters tall). As Simbha also reported above, neither of the buildings are hospital buildings. The shorter is residential. The taller is commercial office space (and I don't mean medical offices).
  6. Correct. Chevron had been leasing the entire 1400 Smith Building.
  7. What is the price tag on the "vastly expanded HOV/HOT lane network?"
  8. Ralph's report includes the most definitive statement we have seen to date regarding the HQ. Each of us can decide how much faith to put in Ralph's reporting.
  9. What do we know about the size, scope, timing, who, or amenities that we did not know yesterday? (Size and scope we knew as much yesterday as we do today. Timing was fairly easy to estimate given that work has already started. We knew as much yesterday about "who" as we do today... some undefined group of employees currently scattered around Houston; others from outside Houston still to be determined. Specific design and look is new information; General design is not new. Amenities is fairly obvious for a corporate campus.)
  10. The statement to the employees neither states nor implies anything about the world headquarters.
  11. So... we know very little, if anything, more than we did yesterday. Among the things we still do not know with certainty: the future of the downtown tower; the future of the world headquarters; or even the future of the Virginia campus.
  12. Just to be clear, the city is not spending any general revenue money on this project. All of the money going in to this project is generated by the airport.
  13. LOL. How thoughtful you to provide us with a demonstration of a couple additional forms of intellectual dishonesty.
  14. And. . . ??? That is just silly. It is not structured as a loan, so there is no "pay back". So what. The money will still be returned to the state via tolls and will be available for other projects. Not so if the money is spent on commuter rail. Intellectual dishonesty indeed.
  15. Yeah, sort of like the intellectual dishonesty of pretending there is no difference between toll roads built with taxpayer money (that will be paid back by collecting tolls) and commuter rail also built with taxpayer money (but will almost certainly never collect enough fares to cover operating costs, let alone construction and capital investment).
  16. The eventual north B concourses will be able to be connected to the northwest concourse of Terminal C and I think that is the plan. First phase is to remove the "banjos" on the south side of Terminal B and replace them with a 225,000 square foot structure that will connect to the central Terminal B via a single wide bridge (similar to Terminal A in that respect).
  17. Very interesting and good news. I'm very curious as to what Marriott badge they might be considering. We already have Embassy Suites, Courtyard and Residence Inn downtown. Seems highly unlikely we would get a second of any of those. The property is likely too small for a Marriott, JW Marriott, or Marriott Marquis. That leaves Ritz Carlton, Renaissance, Fairfield, Springhill and TownePlace, and, more intriguing, the Autograph Collection and EDITION badges. Several exciting possibilities.
  18. In fairness, that was in the "history of IAH" section of the website.
  19. That is great news! I like that building, but in its present condition it is one of the biggest eyesores downtown. I hope they are successful with this redevelopment.
×
×
  • Create New...