samagon Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 there are 99 cent stores out in suburbia as well, and they are just as shady. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbates2 Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 I couldn't agree more. The 99 cent store off Main is a cool little store to find quick things. I mean you're in the city, and people want suburbia. I don't get that. I went to a concert recently at Toyota Center and it wasn't difficult to see the difference in those who live or grew up in the city and those who didn't. Some of those people looked terrified. I grew up in the area and live downtown currently. I wish the place was gone. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate99 Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Don't know if it is the stores or the transit intersections, but I've never seen anyone OD'ing in the middle of the day as well as multiple public "domestic" violence episodes at any other corner in town. People shop in a number of places in town and don't have people reeking of their own feces shouting obscenities at them. For a place that you want to be a retail district, grittiness is probably best left to memories. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunstar Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 I grew up in the area and live downtown currently. I wish the place was gone. I would defer to anyone that lives downtown on this, since this is their neighborhood. It's easy for me to say I like it, but it's not outside my front door. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrose1100 Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 God forbid something should happen. That's all I'm saying...I'm probably alone on all this, but I enjoy some of the grittier aspects of downtown in certain pockets. Time Square used to be an interesting place to visit until they turned into Disney World. Ultimately I agree they will get priced out of the market, but I don't relish the idea of forcing these business out just so *wealthy people can feel safer.Fixed it for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kylejack Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 I lived Downtown for 7 years until a couple years ago, and it was a great comfort. It was good to grab a quick canned good or posterboard or whatever. The store continues to exist because there is an economic demand for it. Sorry, but Downtown just isn't ready for a Books-A-Million yet. Certain types of businesses can work and certain can't. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunstar Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Fixed it for you. Damn autocorrect 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronTiger Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 I lived Downtown for 7 years until a couple years ago, and it was a great comfort. It was good to grab a quick canned good or posterboard or whatever. The store continues to exist because there is an economic demand for it. Sorry, but Downtown just isn't ready for a Books-A-Million yet. Certain types of businesses can work and certain can't.I'm pretty sure I mentioned this once, but this whole "Retail District Downtown" idea sounds a lot like what cities tried in the 1970s or 1980s to revive their dying downtown districts, either with glassy malls or pedestrian-only streets, and nothing worked. Best case scenario is that they ended up becoming glorified food courts (in fact, I'm sure that's what already happened to the Shops at Houston Center). The reason was that they were too difficult to get to, offered little what the existing malls in the suburbs didn't, and most importantly, weren't able to support their immediate neighborhoods. Downtown cannot support a full-sized department store, can barely support an outdoor mall of sorts, and can also barely support a supermarket. The nicer parts of the Inner Loop already have shopping districts like Lower Westheimer, Rice Village, the First Ward redevelopment, and others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_cuevas713 Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 (edited) I'm pretty sure I mentioned this once, but this whole "Retail District Downtown" idea sounds a lot like what cities tried in the 1970s or 1980s to revive their dying downtown districts, either with glassy malls or pedestrian-only streets, and nothing worked. Best case scenario is that they ended up becoming glorified food courts (in fact, I'm sure that's what already happened to the Shops at Houston Center). The reason was that they were too difficult to get to, offered little what the existing malls in the suburbs didn't, and most importantly, weren't able to support their immediate neighborhoods. Downtown cannot support a full-sized department store, can barely support an outdoor mall of sorts, and can also barely support a supermarket. The nicer parts of the Inner Loop already have shopping districts like Lower Westheimer, Rice Village, the First Ward redevelopment, and others.You do understand a lot of this has to do with the population living downtown right? With the immediate increase of people living in both downtown and midtown and with quick access via rail, this is far from some 70's attempt at a revival. Edited January 29, 2016 by j_cuevas713 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeerNut Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 You do understand a lot of this has to do with the population living downtown right? With the immediate increase of people living in both downtown and midtown and with quick access via rail, this is far from some 70's attempt at a revival. Don't forget about the college students riding rails to spend their student loans. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrose1100 Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Don't forget about the college students riding rails to spend their student loans.Added Hotel rooms as well. The Houston Center Shops didn't work because they're on an isolated podium, servicing the office crowd like the tunnels. It will be interesting to see the HC's plan to correct this, which is completely the opposite of what they did when they built it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moore713 Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Another key difference is the eras you mentioned were the height of what some deem "White flight ".WhIle the 2000,s have seen a near reverse with many young people and empty nesters opting to leave their big suburban homes for lofts and townhouses closer to city cores. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFootsSocks Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Mods I'd love a PM as to why you guys keep deleting my posts but let other mindless bs stay up. Y'all are so hypocritical smh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronTiger Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 You do understand a lot of this has to do with the population living downtown right? With the immediate increase of people living in both downtown and midtown and with quick access via rail, this is far from some 70's attempt at a revival. Of course it has to do with people living downtown. And yet, even the 2000s-era Houston Pavilions/GreenStreet, which does interact with the street level still struggles to attract retail space and converted it into office space. Even if downtown can support more retail, it may be a handful of stores (maybe a Target, if they're lucky). A full retail district is just going to end up looking like an embarrassment, especially if they start hyping it up like Dallas' Victory Park. Don't forget about the college students riding rails to spend their student loans. Wishful thinking. This is the type of "build it and they will come" mentality that doomed the centers of years ago. I don't know where U of H students go for general shopping, but I'll bet it's driving someplace more established. My cousin in law went to University of Houston, I'll ask her. Added Hotel rooms as well. The Houston Center Shops didn't work because they're on an isolated podium, servicing the office crowd like the tunnels. It will be interesting to see the HC's plan to correct this, which is completely the opposite of what they did when they built it. Hotels will probably make even less of an impact than apartment buildings. Another key difference is the eras you mentioned were the height of what some deem "White flight ".WhIle the 2000,s have seen a near reverse with many young people and empty nesters opting to leave their big suburban homes for lofts and townhouses closer to city cores. I'm pretty sure we've had the discussion before that the "young people moving to cities" was largely overhyped, and it was an older crowd moving to cities, but again, it just seems like a hard sell to justify all that to make a retail district. Did I say that downtown can't support more than convenience stores and fast foods? No. I just think a "retail district" just won't work given the amount of retail downtown and how it's done so far. You can make all sorts of excuses: "Future growth! The existing retail doesn't interact with street level enough! It's not the 1970s anymore, so therefore, it MUST work!", but that doesn't change the facts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Urbannizer Posted January 29, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted January 29, 2016 @bryanjoneshtx via Instagram 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astros148 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Mods I'd love a PM as to why you guys keep deleting my posts but let other mindless bs stay up. Y'all are so hypocritical smh why is no one responding to his post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrose1100 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Hotels will probably make even less of an impact than apartment buildings.Still an impact... A positive impact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronTiger Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Still an impact... A positive impact.Yes, but my point is "lots of hotel rooms" still isn't a retail support, and even so, hotels already address demand themselves by having restaurants or stores with overpriced sundries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFootsSocks Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 why is no one responding to his post?Because in my pain-induced and pain killer driven stupor I acted like an ass. Appendicitis kiddos, it's not fun. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed_Tx Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Ow, get well soon. Had anyone else noticed the new LED street lights the City installed downtown? They provide so much more illumination than the old incandescent streetlights from before. Also, at least on the HoB block, they are installing a ton of new work... errr... street lights as part of the new corridor. We shall not have to depend on the (expletive deleted) ice cream man's headlights for illumination anymore. ..lol 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 I'm pretty sure I mentioned this once, but this whole "Retail District Downtown" idea sounds a lot like what cities tried in the 1970s or 1980s to revive their dying downtown districts, either with glassy malls or pedestrian-only streets, and nothing worked. Best case scenario is that they ended up becoming glorified food courts (in fact, I'm sure that's what already happened to the Shops at Houston Center). The reason was that they were too difficult to get to, offered little what the existing malls in the suburbs didn't, and most importantly, weren't able to support their immediate neighborhoods. Downtown cannot support a full-sized department store, can barely support an outdoor mall of sorts, and can also barely support a supermarket. The nicer parts of the Inner Loop already have shopping districts like Lower Westheimer, Rice Village, the First Ward redevelopment, and others. This post makes about as much sense as your ridiculous claims that a bridge carrying the traffic on the west side of downtown would be a "bridge to nowhere." The only thing this plan has in common with the 70s and 80s revival attempts is that they both involve retail. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monarch Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Because in my pain-induced and pain killer driven stupor I acted like an ass. Appendicitis kiddos, it's not fun. ^^^ you ain't heavy... you're my brother... get well soon my good pal socks! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post hindesky Posted January 30, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted January 30, 2016 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Mods I'd love a PM as to why you guys keep deleting my posts but let other mindless bs stay up. Y'all are so hypocritical smhJust re-read the Terms of Service you agreed to when you signed up for HAIF. It's in there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFootsSocks Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 It's already been taken care of but thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astros148 Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Just re-read the Terms of Service you agreed to when you signed up for HAIF. It's in there. im sure alot of people must read those terms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronTiger Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 (edited) This post makes about as much sense as your ridiculous claims that a bridge carrying the traffic on the west side of downtown would be a "bridge to nowhere." The only thing this plan has in common with the 70s and 80s revival attempts is that they both involve retail. I've just addressed the criticisms to my "bridge to nowhere" quote and I concluded that the term was too harsh. However, please try to actually back up your claims that the retail district has little to do with "70s and 80s revival attempts" instead of resorting to insults. And no, I don't have an anti-downtown bias, if that's what you were suspecting. Edited January 31, 2016 by IronTiger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H-TownChris2 Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Had taken a bunch of this yesterday, but the glare was so bad. Will have a prominent view in the intersection of Leeland and Travis: 1.30 by Chris Rojas, on Flickr 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollusk Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 OK, I'll bite. What's different is that in the 70s and 80s, downtown residential pretty much consisted of 2016 Main, Houston House, the old apartments across the park from the Toyota Center, and the Beaconsfield. If the sidewalks could have been physically rolled up after 6 pm, they would have been. By the early 80s, nearly half of the area inside the 10/45/59 ring was surface parking. The Rice was no longer a hotel but hadn't been converted to lofts yet; its sidewalks reeked of urine as badly as any place downtown. If memory serves, it was the first big residential development downtown since Houston House in the early 60s. There's a bit more than that now and in the near future. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronTiger Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 OK, I'll bite. What's different is that in the 70s and 80s, downtown residential pretty much consisted of 2016 Main, Houston House, the old apartments across the park from the Toyota Center, and the Beaconsfield. If the sidewalks could have been physically rolled up after 6 pm, they would have been. By the early 80s, nearly half of the area inside the 10/45/59 ring was surface parking. The Rice was no longer a hotel but hadn't been converted to lofts yet; its sidewalks reeked of urine as badly as any place downtown. If memory serves, it was the first big residential development downtown since Houston House in the early 60s. There's a bit more than that now and in the near future.The parking lots were mostly from the failure of the original Houston Center, which was supposed to be a massive development with people-movers, buildings cantilevered over city streets, and a whole lot of other ambitious stuff. The demolition of nearly half of the buildings within the 59/45/10 ring was probably the single most damaging thing to downtown.Now that I've gotten that off my chest, of course downtown has gotten leaps and bounds better in nearly all aspects, but I still don't think it's "there" yet based on the little retail that has been built not doing especially well (like GreenStreet/Houston Pavilions). I don't even know what the occupancy levels are like inside the residential apartments either (if it has 2000 units but only a quarter of them are filled, that makes a big difference!). Last I heard, Commerce Towers wasn't doing especially well (I could be basing that on out of date information), and even within the last two years, Humble Oil Building had converted the section of the building with loft apartments into a third hotel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.