citykid09 Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 (edited) I didn't create this topic to rag on Houston, but I created it so that maybe Houston would get its act together. I was twice this past week and noticed trash all along many of the freeways, many run down buildings that still are used for business. How do these businesses distingish them self from one another when there are miles and miles of other junky looking businesses? Its like they don't care how the businesses look or how they make the city look. And why do businesses that go into locations were another business was and just past their sign right over the spot where the old one was? Don't they see that it needs to be fixed to where you can't see the faded spots where the old sign was? And its made worst when they are the large off the building signs that are ment to be seen from the freeway. And then there are the messed up parking lots with the weeds growing through, etc. Why does i-45 to the Woodlands have a wiggly dividing wall with a extra large shoulder lane that is cluttered with trash?There are nice areas though, the West loop and its businesses are pretty nice, and much of beltway 8 and its businesses are nice. Also parts of the inner 610 portion of 59 are nice.Do people just not care how their city looks? The city keeps the above areas looking nice a fresh, but neglect the other areas, why? With all the trash just thrown everywhere and the miles and miles of ugly generic looking businesses seen from the freeways someone should tell the city that it needs to clean up its act and be stricter on codes about littering, and the keepup of properties and the exterior buildings. Edited January 3, 2009 by citykid09 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 How would you say Houston looks compared to, say, Atlanta? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citykid09 Posted January 3, 2009 Author Share Posted January 3, 2009 it's obvious you have no idea who has responsilbilty for certain tasks.Well it's obvious whom ever is is not doing their job.How would you say Houston looks compared to, say, Atlanta?Atlanta freeways are forested, so its much different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 I didn't create this topic to rag on Houston, but I created it so that maybe Houston would get its act together. I was twice this past week and noticed trash all along many of the freeways, many run down buildings that still are used for business. How do these businesses distingish them self from one another when there are miles and miles of other junky looking businesses? Its like they don't care how the businesses look or how they make the city look. And why do businesses that go into locations were another business was and just past their sign right over the spot where the old one was? Don't they see that it needs to be fixed to where you can't see the faded spots where the old sign was? And its made worst when they are the large off the building signs that are ment to be seen from the freeway. And then there are the messed up parking lots with the weeds growing through, etc. Why does i-45 to the Woodlands have a wiggly dividing wall with a extra large shoulder lane that is cluttered with trash?There are nice areas though, the West loop and its businesses are pretty nice, and much of beltway 8 and its businesses are nice. Also parts of the inner 610 portion of 59 are nice.Do people just not care how their city looks? The city keeps the above areas looking nice a fresh, but neglect the other areas, why? With all the trash just thrown everywhere and the miles and miles of ugly generic looking businesses seen from the freeways someone should tell the city that it needs to clean up its act and be stricter on codes about littering, and the keepup of properties and the exterior buildings.I would agree that Houston has large stretches of ugly areas, although it would be impossible to make a meaningful comparison to other cities on that count. A neat visual appearance just has never been a big priority here. Littering has always been a problem. The problem is the "broken windows" theory kicks in. When people see an ugly trashed up environment they are more likely to trash things up themselves. Easy to pick out the problem, but hard to think of how a solution could be implemented.Note a long series of off topic replies and personal remarks was cleaned up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeebus Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 Citykid, can you give more specific examples of where these areas were? Perhaps some were the City of Houston's responsibly, where as some might be Harris County's.As for the rundown buildings, sometimes thats all the space a small business can afford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citykid09 Posted January 3, 2009 Author Share Posted January 3, 2009 Citykid, can you give more specific examples of where these areas were? Perhaps some were the City of Houston's responsibly, where as some might be Harris County's.As for the rundown buildings, sometimes thats all the space a small business can afford.The Southwest freeway, 290, 1-45, people need to stop "MESSING WITH TEXAS." I think the west loop through the Bellaire area is a good example of how clean the freeways and there surroundings should look. The center wall it a solid one piece, you don't see trash everywhere etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeebus Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 Well, its probably a lot easier for smaller municipalities with only small stretches of freeway frontage to keep them clean. You'll find that Sugar Land has clean frontage as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BryanS Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 The biggest problem is business and billboard signage, along the freeways, and pretty much everywhere in the city. I would advocate, by marshal law if necessary, a city ordinance that forbids all signage along freeways and all major thoroughfares. Businesses feel the need for excessive signage, as way to exclaim: "Here we are!! Right here!" ... since the dawn of the internet age... all I need to know, to get to a business, is the freeway block number. So once all freeway and business signage has been immediately disposed of... I would, every half mile down all of Houston's major freeways, affix to the freeway light posts a number, indicating what "block" of the freeway you are on. So if I needed to go to the Lowes... and knew what block it was on, I could get on the freeway, know exactly where I am, and what exit I would need to take. Easy. Businesses would be permitted to affix their signage to their buildings, but cannot exceed the roof line. That would clean up a lot around here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahiki Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 The biggest problem is business and billboard signage, along the freeways, and pretty much everywhere in the city. I would advocate, by marshal law if necessary, a city ordinance that forbids all signage along freeways and all major thoroughfares. Businesses feel the need for excessive signage, as way to exclaim: "Here we are!! Right here!" ... since the dawn of the internet age... all I need to know, to get to a business, is the freeway block number. So once all freeway and business signage has been immediately disposed of... I would, every half mile down all of Houston's major freeways, affix to the freeway light posts a number, indicating what "block" of the freeway you are on. So if I needed to go to the Lowes... and knew what block it was on, I could get on the freeway, know exactly where I am, and what exit I would need to take. Easy. Businesses would be permitted to affix their signage to their buildings, but cannot exceed the roof line. That would clean up a lot around here.That is a good idea and would make a big difference. I think a big problem though are the frontage roads. If you drive down 288, which does not have frontage roads, you see the difference. It is a much more attractive freeway than any other I can think of locally. None of the nastiness that collects along frontage roads throughout the rest of the city. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
20thStDad Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 That is a good idea and would make a big difference. I think a big problem though are the frontage roads. If you drive down 288, which does not have frontage roads, you see the difference. It is a much more attractive freeway than any other I can think of locally. None of the nastiness that collects along frontage roads throughout the rest of the city.I agree. The frontage roads might do well for traffic, but they really fugly up the freeways. I doubt there's any alternative to it now. As for excessive signage, I can't imagine an ordinance like that ever passing. I can see a start-up community trying to pull that from day 0, but the cost and amount of trash it would create to de-sign all the junkiness is astounding. Litter, however, is something that I think can be addressed. I believe that half, if not more, of it comes out of the back of pick up trucks as they drive. I know some people chuck stuff out the window, but I doubt it's enough to account for all of the trash out there. The city should start a massive volunteer/prisoner (maybe not on the same day!) campaign to clean up what's out there now, and then start fining the dickens out of all offenders. 2nd offense warrants jail time. And this includes the pick up truck litterers. Most purposeful litterers are either kids or poor (just an assumption based on observations of where I've seen the most trash), so a nice $1000 minimum fine is really going to hit home. As for old buildings, I bet we have a lot fewer run-down areas than, say, Detroit. And I would say most decent sized southern cities are as bad or worse than Houston. The only cities that maybe don't have those areas have geographical limitations, so their space is at a premium and not worth wasting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citykid09 Posted January 3, 2009 Author Share Posted January 3, 2009 I agree. The frontage roads might do well for traffic, but they really fugly up the freeways. I doubt there's any alternative to it now. As for excessive signage, I can't imagine an ordinance like that ever passing. I can see a start-up community trying to pull that from day 0, but the cost and amount of trash it would create to de-sign all the junkiness is astounding. Litter, however, is something that I think can be addressed. I believe that half, if not more, of it comes out of the back of pick up trucks as they drive. I know some people chuck stuff out the window, but I doubt it's enough to account for all of the trash out there. The city should start a massive volunteer/prisoner (maybe not on the same day!) campaign to clean up what's out there now, and then start fining the dickens out of all offenders. 2nd offense warrants jail time. And this includes the pick up truck litterers. Most purposeful litterers are either kids or poor (just an assumption based on observations of where I've seen the most trash), so a nice $1000 minimum fine is really going to hit home. As for old buildings, I bet we have a lot fewer run-down areas than, say, Detroit. And I would say most decent sized southern cities are as bad or worse than Houston. The only cities that maybe don't have those areas have geographical limitations, so their space is at a premium and not worth wasting.I think they should hire people (maybe homeless people) to collect trash off the street and from people stopped at red lights that could also give the person collecting the trash tips. That way everyone could be happy. The homeless make money for doing something, and the city is cleaner. Just a thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BryanS Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 I agree. The frontage roads might do well for traffic, but they really fugly up the freeways. I doubt there's any alternative to it now. As for excessive signage, I can't imagine an ordinance like that ever passing. I can see a start-up community trying to pull that from day 0, but the cost and amount of trash it would create to de-sign all the junkiness is astounding.No they don't. The road is not what is ugly. It's all the signage along the road. Freeway, frontage, major streets that are off freeways, etc. can all be trashed with signage and billboards. 288 is "pretty" because large stretches of it aren't even developed yet. Has nothing to do with frontage roads, or lack thereof, IMO.Why would it not pass? I can see zoning not passing, because Houston is way past any hope of being zoned. You'd have to tear down residential from commercial areas and vice versa. That would be a hassle. But why not a bill or ordinance that would require business owners to comply with "no signage" - not within a seven or nine year grace period - but 90 days. The city's trash problem is not what is thrown on the ground; it's what's in the air (signs and billboards). I'd love to vote for a get tough, no-signage ordinance. ... and if something like that does not pass... then what does that really say about the city? If the city can contract to clean up the entire city after a major hurricane... certainly it can deal with all billboards and tacky signage that will need to be disposed of, in short order.I cannot read, from the freeway, 3" block letters of a business Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasVines Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 criminals, people on welfare, beggars, people in tax payer financed drug programs, people on probation or parole with no other job.......there are 10s of thousands of people out there to clean up a mess at very little additional cost......we as a society just need to have the guts to force these people to contribute instead of giving them a pass daily Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trae Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 People on welfare? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
20thStDad Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 No they don't. The road is not what is ugly. It's all the signage along the road. Freeway, frontage, major streets that are off freeways, etc. can all be trashed with signage and billboards. 288 is "pretty" because large stretches of it aren't even developed yet. Has nothing to do with frontage roads, or lack thereof, IMO.Why would it not pass? I can see zoning not passing, because Houston is way past any hope of being zoned. You'd have to tear down residential from commercial areas and vice versa. That would be a hassle. But why not a bill or ordinance that would require business owners to comply with "no signage" - not within a seven or nine year grace period - but 90 days. The city's trash problem is not what is thrown on the ground; it's what's in the air (signs and billboards). I'd love to vote for a get tough, no-signage ordinance. ... and if something like that does not pass... then what does that really say about the city? If the city can contract to clean up the entire city after a major hurricane... certainly it can deal with all billboards and tacky signage that will need to be disposed of, in short order.I cannot read, from the freeway, 3" block letters of a business's address on their door. To remedy that, businesses are compelled to erect signage, because signs can be made much larger than 3" block letters. But instead of the business erecting a huge sign, I'd rather see the block number on the freeway (on a 1 foot by 6 foot "marker," every half mile or so), eliminating the need for road-side business signage. I wouldn't even need to know the cross street. If I wanted to go some computer repair shop that I found on the internet that is at 10560 SW freeway, all I need to do is get to the SW freeway and just drive to that block marker. No signage required. Cleans up the place and provides a useful system of navigation that is woefully missing in this city.The feeder roads do ugly up the freeway, because it becomes lined with shopping centers and other crappy types of businesses that don't mind being on freeways. No feeder, no addresses, no businesses right there. Or at least maybe they don't stack up so densely, thus demanding annoying signage to make their business stand out amongst the hundreds of others...I'm not even talking about billboards, I think a ban on those could pass. Those are pure advertising. But companies who put signs up to indicate their location? Never gonna happen. Fast food joints need that, and those are big companies that will fight the hell out of anything like that trying to get passed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeebus Posted January 3, 2009 Share Posted January 3, 2009 I think they should hire people (maybe homeless people) to collect trash off the street and from people stopped at red lights that could also give the person collecting the trash tips. That way everyone could be happy. The homeless make money for doing something, and the city is cleaner. Just a thought.Too Utopian.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 I agree. The frontage roads might do well for traffic, but they really fugly up the freeways. I doubt there's any alternative to it now. As for excessive signage, I can't imagine an ordinance like that ever passing. I can see a start-up community trying to pull that from day 0, but the cost and amount of trash it would create to de-sign all the junkiness is astounding. Litter, however, is something that I think can be addressed. I believe that half, if not more, of it comes out of the back of pick up trucks as they drive. I know some people chuck stuff out the window, but I doubt it's enough to account for all of the trash out there. The city should start a massive volunteer/prisoner (maybe not on the same day!) campaign to clean up what's out there now, and then start fining the dickens out of all offenders. 2nd offense warrants jail time. And this includes the pick up truck litterers. Most purposeful litterers are either kids or poor (just an assumption based on observations of where I've seen the most trash), so a nice $1000 minimum fine is really going to hit home. As for old buildings, I bet we have a lot fewer run-down areas than, say, Detroit. And I would say most decent sized southern cities are as bad or worse than Houston. The only cities that maybe don't have those areas have geographical limitations, so their space is at a premium and not worth wasting.Good points, although I would guess that the frontage roads make both the visual blight and traffic worse. The latter because they have the effect of steering local trips onto freeways. That is why every other city in the country has avoided them. like the idea of $1000 fines for littering. Unless we send a strong message that it won't be tolerated it will continue to be a problem. It's come up before in other topics, but one thing that I really think contributes to fugliness in Houston is the overhead power lines everywhere. IMO nothing does more to give that special cheap third world ambiance. Even my former colleague from Turkey was appalled that a city the size of Houston doesn't bury the lines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmancuso Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 hate to say it but houston is just an ugly city and short of bulldozing the entire area and starting over, i don't see that changing. houston already has an ordinance that downed billboards are not allowed to be replaced. plus, it's not just the bill boards, it's the endless amount of strip malls, surface lots and cheap apartment complexes.when the city/ state/ whoever does try to beautify a stretch of freeway (like 59 near montrose), the walls and bridges are trashed with graffiti. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kylejack Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 Houston jails are overcrowded and cannot afford space for litterers. Every litterer placed in a jail cell is someone worse getting released onto the streets. Do it with fines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citykid09 Posted January 4, 2009 Author Share Posted January 4, 2009 (edited) Now Knowing that feeders are partly the blame for "Ugly" in Houston, I wonder if they will mess 288 up by adding feeders? And in new areas will they go ahead and do underground power-lines and not allow the huge outrages signs and billboards everywhere?Just how did Houston expect to get the Olympics with the city in the condition its in? Was it planning to clean all of that up and speed up plans for mass-transit? Does it take an Olympics for Houston to clean up? Edited January 4, 2009 by citykid09 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 And in new areas will they go ahead and do underground power-lines and not allow the huge outrages signs and billboards everywhere?Fat chance I'm afraid. You would think that after the experience with Ike this year there would be a huge program to start burying the lines. You would think, but you'd be wrong.Just how did Houston expect to get the Olympics with the city in the condition its in? Was it planning to clean all of that up and speed up plans for mass-transit? Does it take an Olympics for Houston to clean up?They obviously knew that the ugliness factor would hurt Houston's chances. True story: when the Olympic selection committee reps were visiting Houston, their drivers were instructed not to drive them downtown via Hardy Toll Road, 59 or 45 so they wouldn't be bowled over by the miles of sprawl. They had to detour on the North Belt to 290 (I think), and make the approach from that direction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musicman Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 their drivers were instructed not to drive them downtown via Hardy Toll Road, 59 or 45 so they wouldn't be bowled over by the miles of sprawl.so taking a longer drive helps that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musicman Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 unless taste can be dictated, eliminating feeders won't stop the problem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasVines Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 Houston jails are overcrowded and cannot afford space for litterers. Every litterer placed in a jail cell is someone worse getting released onto the streets. Do it with fines.fines mean nothing....you do it with fines to cover the cost of administration and mandatory NO BUYING YOUR WAY OUT requirements of picking up litter for one full day and it you don't make a good faith attempt you get to do it again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C2H Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 Denver built a huge noise reduction wall on the main freeway (I-25) with little concrete designs when they expanded their LRT. That helped hide some of their blight. I think if Houston did that it would help. It seems that the only freeways that are cared for are West Loop and I-10 West (Katy Freeway). 59 near Montrose does struggle with gang members who constantly trash it up with Grafitti.I personally think a noise reduction wall which is tall enough to hide the ugliness of the city is what is needed. I was very frustrated and embarrased when I was driving my mother around while she was visiting for Thanksgiving. She was born and raised in Houston but said she understands why people think Houston is ugly when we were driving on South Loop between 288 and 45. She did say that the Katy Freeway was gorgeous and progressive looking but that's only a small portion of this gigantic city. Trees for Houston is a good attempt to beautify the freeways but its not enough to hide the ugly stretches off I45, East Freeway, 610E, and 290. The Palm Trees they planted on I-45 are not working. Half of them are dying and dried up making it look even worse. I think a wall is the only answer to the problem since it doesn't appear that the shabby businesses off 45 aren't going anywhere. SOMETHING definitely needs to be done!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyphen Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 (edited) I'm not even talking about billboards, I think a ban on those could pass. Those are pure advertising. But companies who put signs up to indicate their location? Never gonna happen. Fast food joints need that, and those are big companies that will fight the hell out of anything like that trying to get passed.Maybe one solution is to use highway signs like you see once you leave the city, like on the way to Conroe, that announce the exit number with the list of restaurants and gas stations coming up? It could just be a matter of having uniform signs like these that are tasteful and not so noticeable and gaudy, instead of business having all different shapes, sizes, fonts, designs like now. Or just have no signs at all. How do other cities solve this problem? Edited January 5, 2009 by skyphen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
memebag Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 Maybe one solution is to use highway signs like you see once you leave the city, like on the way to Conroe, that announce the exit number with the list of restaurants and gas stations coming up? It could just be a matter of having uniform signs like these that are tasteful and not so noticeable and gaudy, instead of business having all different shapes, sizes, fonts, designs like now. Or just have no signs at all. How do other cities solve this problem? Totalitarian dictatorships. You folks should move to The Village. Not Rice Village. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayshoota Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 59 near Montrose does struggle with gang members who constantly trash it up with Grafitti.This area has always had problems with grafitti but over the past month or so it has gotten really bad. Looks horrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BryanS Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 (edited) Maybe one solution is to use highway signs like you see once you leave the city, like on the way to Conroe, that announce the exit number with the list of restaurants and gas stations coming up? It could just be a matter of having uniform signs like these that are tasteful and not so noticeable and gaudy, instead of business having all different shapes, sizes, fonts, designs like now. Or just have no signs at all. How do other cities solve this problem?Even around Houston, we have that. When you look in the yellow pages... what do you see? Addresses. Not exit numbers. Not mile markers. No signs that show what is at the exit... Addresses.I just randomly turned to page 190 in the CL yellow pages. There is an ad for Sprint. Location: 12804 Gulf Freeway. That's all it says. But where is that on the freeway??? If I could see a block number... sure would make it easy. But no. I must go to google maps... look at the cross street... and then exit and see their ugly signage on the side of the road. In this case, probably a giant sign, with all the businesses that are in that strip mall. When I go to a strip mall, I never look at the big sign... I am looking at the actual building... "Casa Ole... no.... Mr. Gattis... no... 24 hour fitness... I really need to go there... but no... Specs... maybe later... Sprint... That's it!"We are never going to get rid of frontage roads. The next best thing is to eliminate all signage, billboards along the freeway. And businesses would not be footing the bill for block markers. COH would cover that. Edited January 5, 2009 by BryanS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fringe Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 (edited) hate to say it but houston is just an ugly city and short of bulldozing the entire area and starting over, i don't see that changing. houston already has an ordinance that downed billboards are not allowed to be replaced. plus, it's not just the bill boards, it's the endless amount of strip malls, surface lots and cheap apartment complexes.when the city/ state/ whoever does try to beautify a stretch of freeway (like 59 near montrose), the walls and bridges are trashed with graffiti.Gotta agree with you. I love Houston but it is freakin ugly. Especially to newcomers. I just try to tell them that it has it's good points and nice areas, you just have to look over the general ugliness. Edited January 5, 2009 by LunaticFringe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.