Jump to content

Chevron Skyscraper Proposal At 1600 Louisiana St.


ricco67

Recommended Posts

^I was responding to someone who said the extra year will allow for a better design.  Usually when projects get "put on hold" it is due to money.  Nothing more, nothing less.  Even for a company as big and powerful as Chevron. Perhaps the money is better spent elsewhere now?  Maybe enough shareholders raised concerns that they don't need a new tower in Houston?  Or executives are rethinking if perhaps they wouldn't be better off doing something else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we should read into this too much as being a downtown- or even Houston-specific issue. The word is that they planned other buildings in Pittsburgh and Bakersfield, and these have been delayed (but I don't think cancelled yet).

The expansion of their building in Louisiana, which was over capacity from when it was opened in 2008, has also been delayed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 they have frozen all projects in place , except for the mid land one( not just Houston but varies other cities) but
 They are still going thu with employee tranfers to Houston, and stated they are still bulking of their employee work force in Houston, so the tranfers are still happening.

what it sounds like to me is that they may have signed a tenet deal with one of the new towers planned. Why else would they freeze the building , but state they will go ahead witht he employee transfers
ratepost.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 they have frozen all projects in place , except for the mid land one( not just Houston but varies other cities) but

 They are still going thu with employee tranfers to Houston, and stated they are still bulking of their employee work force in Houston, so the tranfers are still happening.

what it sounds like to me is that they may have signed a tenet deal with one of the new towers planned. Why else would they freeze the building , but state they will go ahead witht he employee transfers

ratepost.png

 

 

hmm.  If I were Shorenstein, I'd be trying to entice them over to Bell St.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mexico is ending their oil monopoly, inviting foreign investment. Look for oil prices to drop and production there doubles in the next few years.

 

 

you would think that if Chevron grabs a chunk of that, they'll need more office space... lol

 

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-16/north-america-to-drown-in-oil-as-mexico-ends-monopoly.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This tower is like 1/170th the cost of the Australia project and they can't manage to squeeze this tower into their budget? Lame.. Hopefully 2015 brings us better news

Thats what I was thinking.

"My budgets kinda strapped right now and I wanna finish building out my home theatre setup so im not gonna buy any gum this month."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't a problem of budget, rather a problem of cash flow.  This project is critical to the future of their operations, they will likely start sooner than one they announced.  In the meantime look on the bright side, this does allow time for redesign!!!

 

I can imagine when the RE team goes in front of the capex committee to request additional funds for the redesign: "I know we are billions of dollars over budget on other projects, but we really need more money on this one, the haifers don't like the design!" 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would assume that a large reason for this tower is to compete with Exxon for talent.  This shiny new tower in downtown vs Exxon's shiny campus in the boonies.  As much as I hate that they have a cash flow issue delaying it, I am still confident that they will build it.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This tower is like 1/170th the cost of the Australia project and they can't manage to squeeze this tower into their budget? Lame.. Hopefully 2015 brings us better news

Not lame at all. You need to focus not on the total Australia cost, most of which was already budgeted/allocated, but on the unexpected increase of $2 Billion. The company has a certain amount of money available for capital projects. They aren't the federal Government, which can just print more money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would assume that a large reason for this tower is to compete with Exxon for talent.  This shiny new tower in downtown vs Exxon's shiny campus in the boonies.  As much as I hate that they have a cash flow issue delaying it, I am still confident that they will build it.  

 

Boonies? You speak like you're from a small little town somewhere. You people need to wake up and realize that The Woodlands is a major economic hub now in a county pushing over 500,000 people. I'm not sure ''Boonies'' is the word I would have chosen for it. The campus (Exxon) is sitting on the Harris/Montgomery county line. If it were in Willis or Huntsville, then I could agree.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about "BFE"? The woodlands is definitely out there for folks wanting to live in a big city. I don't know anyone that is excited about the new Exxon campus so I'm not sure chevron needs the tower to compete for talent. My understanding s that Exxon is anticipating having some retention issuers wih the move . . . .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boonies? You speak like you're from a small little town somewhere. You people need to wake up and realize that The Woodlands is a major economic hub now in a county pushing over 500,000 people. I'm not sure ''Boonies'' is the word I would have chosen for it. The campus (Exxon) is sitting on the Harris/Montgomery county line. If it were in Willis or Huntsville, then I could agree.

Hardly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't a problem of budget, rather a problem of cash flow.  This project is critical to the future of their operations, they will likely start sooner than one they announced.  In the meantime look on the bright side, this does allow time for redesign!!!

 

I can imagine when the RE team goes in front of the capex committee to request additional funds for the redesign: "I know we are billions of dollars over budget on other projects, but we really need more money on this one, the haifers don't like the design!" 

True, but I bet the RE team is not the only group that has input on projects this big. If anything they're probably just a middle man at least for the facade design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boonies? You speak like you're from a small little town somewhere. You people need to wake up and realize that The Woodlands is a major economic hub now in a county pushing over 500,000 people. I'm not sure ''Boonies'' is the word I would have chosen for it. The campus (Exxon) is sitting on the Harris/Montgomery county line. If it were in Willis or Huntsville, then I could agree.

The Woodlands is a shining emerald in a sea of booniness. You might say it's the Houston of Montgomery County... As Houston is to Texas.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...