TexasStar Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 So any thing new going up in Victory lately? Putting the "Park" in Victory Park The Cirque The House House of Blues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 I agree, the enthusiasm over at dallasmetropolis seems more tempered than it does here. I think there's just something about showing off and shoving stuff in other peoples' faces that's kind of a common human condition. This being a Houston forum, folks from Dallas love to come on here with unabridled excitement and basically brag about what Dallas has and Houston doesn't. The reverse probably would be true if dallasmetropolis had a decent Houston subforum.Also, while Dallas people definitely make posts here that are too excited and/or too positive, Houston folks do just the opposite with negativity and unabashed criticism.But in the end, all of that positive and negative crap put together makes a really entertaining and interesting subforum which is probably why there's so much more activity here than any other Outside Houston subforum.Fair enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxDave Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 Correct me if I'm wrong but Houston DT is 1.8 sq miles and Dallas DT is 1.2 sq' miles so were not talking about at least twice the size. Also 90% of DT Houston structures are with-in a sq' mile. Majority of the blocks on the east side are parking lots.I don't know where your official deisgnations of "downtown" come from, but considering that what you define as Downtown Dallas lags Houston considerably, couldn't new, immediately adjacent development such as Victroy Park be included as downtown Dallas? If you allocate Dallas the same 1.8 sq miles as Houston, it will easily pick up much of Victory and and adjacent Uptown areas. Downtown Dallas is definitely expanding - arguably to the benefit or detriment of the "old" downtown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Analog Posted May 21, 2007 Share Posted May 21, 2007 (edited) I don't know where your official deisgnations of "downtown" come from, but considering that what you define as Downtown Dallas lags Houston considerably, couldn't new, immediately adjacent development such as Victory Park be included as downtown Dallas? If you allocate Dallas the same 1.8 sq miles as Houston, it will easily pick up much of Victory and and adjacent Uptown areas. Downtown Dallas is definitely expanding - arguably to the benefit or detriment of the "old" downtown.Only the very edge of Uptown would be included... maybe just the Crescent, W or ZaZa.Friends of mine from Manhatten, Boston and "downtown" Dallas say they consider Victory to be downtown. In fact, they looked at me like I was nuts for even asking. Stand at The House or W and look up, it's downtown. Edited May 21, 2007 by Analog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted May 21, 2007 Share Posted May 21, 2007 Only the very edge of Uptown would be included... maybe just the Crescent, W or ZaZa.Friends of mine from Manhatten, Boston and "downtown" Dallas say they consider Victory to be downtown. In fact, they looked at me like I was nuts for even asking. Stand at The House or W and look up, it's downtown. In Houston, our midtown residential boom is just about the exact distance to DT as Victory is to DT Dallas. The difference here is that we consider it outside of DT. Having said that, by your above definition of downtown (and your buddies from the East coast definition), us jealous Houstonians can now claim our midtown and all of it's new population to the now ever expanding guidelines of what a "central business district" is. After all, if an East coaster says it's DT, it must be true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted May 21, 2007 Share Posted May 21, 2007 I cant believe you dorks are still bitching about it. Oh, they'll go on forever... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxDave Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 In Houston, our midtown residential boom is just about the exact distance to DT as Victory is to DT Dallas. The difference here is that we consider it outside of DT. Having said that, by your above definition of downtown (and your buddies from the East coast definition), us jealous Houstonians can now claim our midtown and all of it's new population to the now ever expanding guidelines of what a "central business district" is. After all, if an East coaster says it's DT, it must be true. Exactly! As Midtown Houston develops more density, it will likely become less of an "adjacent" neighborhood and more of "Downtown" proper - especially as the region grows and everything inside 610 becomes considered "downtown Houston". If you are truly splitting hairs about whether or not a couple of city blocks separate Victory from Downtown Dallas, you are really missing the big picture of urban development in both cities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 (edited) 08:23 AM CDT on Thursday, May 24, 2007By STEVE BROWN / The Dallas Morning Newsstevebrown@dallasnews.com"After months of speculation, accounting giant Ernst & Young LLP confirmed Thursday that it will move its North Texas headquarters to the Victory project near downtown.Ernst & Young will lease about 150,000 square feet in the One Victory Park building which is under construction just north of Woodall Rodgers Freeway. The company will move into the 20-story building, which is 85 percent leased, in July 2009."We are very pleased to join other well established Dallas companies in making the exciting move to Victory Park," Ernst & Young Managing Partner Clint McDonnough said in announcing the planned move.Other tenants in the building will include law firm Haynes & Boone LLP and PlainsCapital Bank."Victory's gain is downtown's loss. E&Y is moving out downtown Dallas' 2100 Ross (formerly San Jacinto Tower). (Haynes & Boone is also moving from downtown Dallas.) Edited May 24, 2007 by Houston19514 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 08:23 AM CDT on Thursday, May 24, 2007By STEVE BROWN / The Dallas Morning Newsstevebrown@dallasnews.comVictory's gain is downtown's loss. E&Y is moving out downtown Dallas' 2100 Ross (formerly San Jacinto Tower). (Haynes & Boone is also moving from downtown Dallas.)So even the local paper agrees that Victory is not DT.Look, let's just agree that Victory is a cool project. I simply enjoy being in the canyons of DT Houston, and that's my take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 Why not just beat it to death? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 Legal Boundary of the Central Business District (CBD) or "Downtown", as promulgated by Dallas City Council...(22) CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT means the area of the city within Woodall Rodgers Freeway, Central Expressway (elevated bypass), R. L. Thornton Freeway, and Stemmons Freeway.Victory is variously described as "Victory", or "Uptown/Victory".Legal Boundary of the Central Business District (CBD) or "Downtown", as promulgated by Houston City Council...Central business district shall mean the area beginning at the intersection of the centerline of U.S. 59 and the centerline of I.H. 45; thence in a northwesterly and northerly direction along the centerline of I.H. 45 to its intersection with the centerline of I.H. 10; thence in an easterly direction along the centerline of I.H. 10 to its intersection with the centerline of U.S. 59; thence in a southwesterly direction along the centerline of U.S. 59 to its intersection with I.H. 45, the point of beginning.Midtown is described as "Midtown".Thus, if one were speaking of legal definitions, Victory is NOT part of Downtown, and Midtown is NOT part of Downtown. However, personal opinions belong to the person uttering the opinion. Therefore, if Dallas residents prefer to state that Victory is part of Downtown as an opinion, it is their right, just as I may state that, in my opinion, Friendswood is part of the Clear Lake Area, even though legally, Friendswood is an incorporated town. As it is my opinion, no one may claim that I am wrong. However, since I prefer the legally defined terms to stating a wildly inflated opinion, I will continue to state that LEGALLY, Victory is NOT part of the Dallas CBD, but rather, adjacent to it, just as Midtown Houston is adjacent to the Houston CBD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 (edited) I don't think the average person really cares what the boundaries are. The whole midtown, uptown thing is stupid and is only meant for real estate purposes. I sounded like a real putz one day and said that in front of my buddies one day, "I'm going to midtown today to drop off some mail." The location was off elgin and main. They laughed at me and tried correcting me and said "You mean downtown?" Even though i knew i was right, i think just regular people look at you as anal if you go around describing all boundaries and being precise on everything. To me, midtown is basically downtown Houston. Same applies to Dallas's uptown and Victory park. I still do think Dallas made a big mistake by building Victory out if they were trying to revitalize downtown. To me, Houston will be the more urban downtown of the two because everything is connected and flows better. Dallas just built Victory just for the sake of building it. Building something just to be cool and hip shows a little bit of insecurity and being something you're not. Not trying to knock it, but Dallas has tried so hard and is still continuing to shake off the perception that outsiders think of it.... The Cowboy town it once was. Dallasites, don't get offended because its the truthI won't comment on why your friends look at you funny, as that is your business. However, your comment on Dallas' "mistake" in building Victory is incorrect. If you know the history of the Victory development, you would know that previously, this was a non-tax producing brownfield. The City and developers cleaned up the brownfield, allowing billions of dollars of tax producing buildings to be constructed. Victory is as far from a "mistake" as one could get.This was not done because of Dallas "insecurity". It was done to return useless land to tax producing status. Comments by Dallas residents are one thing. Actions by the City of Dallas to improve the tax base are quite another. You should learn to distinguish between the two. Edited May 25, 2007 by RedScare Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N Judah Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 Well, the MT v. DT boundary thing is significant because the requirement for building setbacks of 25 feet only applies outside of downtown. That is why suburban style development keeps popping up in midtown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallasboi Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 I won't comment on why your friends look at you funny, as that is your business. However, your comment on Dallas' "mistake" in building Victory is incorrect. If you know the history of the Victory development, you would know that previously, this was a non-tax producing brownfield. The City and developers cleaned up the brownfield, allowing billions of dollars of tax producing buildings to be constructed. Victory is as far from a "mistake" as one could get.This was not done because of Dallas "insecurity". It was done to return useless land to tax producing status. Comments by Dallas residents are one thing. Actions by the City of Dallas to improve the tax base are quite another. You should learn to distinguish between the two. I didn't think I would ever be saying this....but ....."Red this was a brilliant post". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 Several posts have been removed from this thread. If you don't have anything civil to say, don't post. If it continues, this thread will be closed and the violators' posting abilities will be restricted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxDave Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 Can someone please remind me when Houston Pavillions is scheduled to open? I can't wait to come visit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HtownWxBoy Posted June 3, 2007 Share Posted June 3, 2007 Can someone please remind me when Houston Pavillions is scheduled to open? I can't wait to come visit!It's scheduled to open in October of '08... of course that could change a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwcre8tive Posted June 4, 2007 Share Posted June 4, 2007 Some new photos of Victory here: http://forum.dallasmetropolis.com/showthread.php?t=6928 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwcre8tive Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Cirque from today:http://forum.dallasmetropolis.com/showpost...p;postcount=552 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trae Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 http://forum.dallasmetropolis.com/attachme...entid=13335.jpgNice looking tower. What does the rendering look like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musicman Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Well, the MT v. DT boundary thing is significant because the requirement for building setbacks of 25 feet only applies outside of downtown. That is why suburban style development keeps popping up in midtown.how would you explain celcius, sacco's, rich's, etc....there are numerous buildings that are out to the sidewalks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 how would you explain celcius, sacco's, rich's, etc....there are numerous buildings that are out to the sidewalks.They apparently sought and received variances, or perhaps, in some cases, the buildings might have been there before the setback ordinance was enacted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musicman Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 They apparently sought and received variances, or perhaps, in some cases, the buildings might have been there before the setback ordinance was enacted.yes so it isn't uncommon in midtown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C2H Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 (edited) Are those residences in Victory filling up quickly? Edited July 20, 2007 by C2H Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxDave Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 (edited) Are those residences in Victory filling up quickly?Honestly, I have no idea how quickly the Victory residences are filling up, but this question alone should separate Victory from Pavillions...Pavillions retail will inject a huge amount of life directly into downtown Houston - it will be a retail and entertainment hub in the center of the city.Victory, on the other hand, is simply creating a "trendy" lifestyle neighborhood adjacent to Downtown Dallas. It may have less retail, but more residences.Each development is currently vital to each city, but they do serve different purposes (and should not be directly compared). Edited July 22, 2007 by TxDave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HtownWxBoy Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 Honestly, I have no idea how quickly the Victory residences are filling up, but this question alone should separate Victory from Pavillions... Pavillions retail will inject a huge amount of life directly into downtown Houston - it will be a retail and entertainment hub in the center of the city. Victory, on the other hand, is simply creating a "trendy" lifestyle neighborhood adjacent to Downtown Dallas. It may have less retail, but more residences. Each development is currently vital to each city, but they do serve different purposes (and should not be directly compared). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C2H Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 Honestly, I have no idea how quickly the Victory residences are filling up, but this question alone should separate Victory from Pavillions...Pavillions retail will inject a huge amount of life directly into downtown Houston - it will be a retail and entertainment hub in the center of the city.Victory, on the other hand, is simply creating a "trendy" lifestyle neighborhood adjacent to Downtown Dallas. It may have less retail, but more residences.Each development is currently vital to each city, but they do serve different purposes (and should not be directly compared).I didn't realize by my asking that question you would think I was comparing the developments. I was just curious about the current residential status.On a side note, I guess when you think about Houston Pavilions and most of the surrounding developments like: Toyota Center, MMpark, Hilton Hotel, Main Street Square, Park Tower, and Downtown Park, we can say Houston has had a "mini" Victory thing going on its own for several years inside its downtown. Most of the residences are popping up ino areas outside its downtown. I guess thats what the topic starter's point in question was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C2H Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 Just got back from Dallas this weekend. I was kind of disappointed to see the Victory Screens are completely turned off at 10pm. It makes it seem like the whole idea was pointless. I thought it was supposed to be like Times Square? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trae Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 I was recently in the Dallas area, too (from Monday until Wednesday). The skyline looks good coming in from US 67/I-35 (hilly too). I didn't get down and look at Victory (only passed by it on Woodall Rogers), and it looked big. The amount of cranes in the area reminded me of the TMC. I didn't get to explore the city much since we went to some resort in Tyler for most of our time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallascaper Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 Just got back from Dallas this weekend. I was kind of disappointed to see the Victory Screens are completely turned off at 10pm. It makes it seem like the whole idea was pointless. I thought it was supposed to be like Times Square? The last time I was in Times Square, in 2004, the place was shut down and the sidewalks rolled up when we got out of our show, at 12:30 AM on a Saturday morning. I was shocked, always thought TS was like the LV strip, but it's not. And neither is Victory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts