shasta Posted Tuesday at 01:47 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:47 PM 16 hours ago, Powermac said: This boggles my mind... What genius actually thinks this looks better than the brick. Also, and I'm genuinely asking, why would the money be spent on laying all of that brick and just painting over it? Perhaps, they always wanted the stucco look and they found this was a cheaper way to get that look??? But I agree, I don;t get this...the neighboring buildings are brick. I mean, RD does do infill projects that add to the city but the aesthetics...yaosers 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidCenturyMoldy Posted Tuesday at 04:42 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 04:42 PM 14 hours ago, EllenOlenska said: ...feeling like I've seen worse. That's the Randall Davis Company's slogan. 1 1 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.A. Posted Tuesday at 06:28 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:28 PM (edited) For me, the worst of the somewhat recently completed tower projects in Houston was Randall Davis' own Marlowe... I haven't been by London House recently but it might be a close call between the 2? Edited Tuesday at 06:51 PM by J.A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powermac Posted Tuesday at 09:50 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 09:50 PM 8 hours ago, shasta said: Perhaps, they always wanted the stucco look and they found this was a cheaper way to get that look??? But I agree, I don;t get this...the neighboring buildings are brick. I mean, RD does do infill projects that add to the city but the aesthetics...yaosers I'm sure someone here with more knowledge on the subject can correct me, but I find it hard to believe that laying brick is cheaper than stucco. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.