Jump to content

METRORail University Line


ricco67

Recommended Posts

main street is pedestrian friendly. just look at this.

Cool find musicman. I feel like a bird going over downtown/midtown. WEEEEEE!!!! ^_^ Although this thing is a little outdated, The Houston Pavilions and Discovery Green are still parking lots.

Oh and thanks for the article lockmat

Edited by C2H
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nb/hei...ws/5515506.html

urban corridor planning meetings last week hosted by the city of Houston's Planning and Development Department...on Jan. 30-31 were the last of the planning process, which began in June 2006 with the intent to create city ordinances to shape land development in the corridors along the Metro rail lines.

Information gathered will now be meshed with that from the other corridors to create ordinances to make them more pedestrian-friendly.

I met no one (of the consulting firm/city bureaucrat moderators) at these meetings that had physically visited any of the points along the proposed line where high-impact aspects of the LRT, like stations and gated crossings, are currently located on METRO maps.

Participants were told that locations of stations, elevated rails, and possible property takings were not open to discussion, that the planning sessions were for development along the line as shown on the METRO maps.

There was no opportunity to discuss the corridors in the context of METRO's FEIS for the U Line.

The sessions were, therefore, an exercise in "planning" along a rail alignment that METRO has neither finalized, nor even released an environmental impact statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where was this done?

We've discussed it before on the forum. I don't remember the exact street intersection, but it was where METRO bought some land from someone who was granted the option to buy it back at the same price if he could make development work, thereby removing the tax burden from him (and tax revenues from every taxing jurisdiction in Midtown).

Ring a bell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh good Lord, how many times is this going to be revisited?? Is the race between these two going to be de facto another vote on this line? Even Culberson seems to have given up beating that drum.

This is just Bacarisse's appeal to conservatives. He has to differentiate himself from Emmett somehow, and "anti-rail" shows his conservative bonafides. Harris County only has the power to appoint some of METRO's board members, not the power to stop the line. Houston still controls the majority of the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nb/hei...ws/5524076.html

Candidates can't agree on Richmond

Could the location still be changed? I thought this was a done deal? I'm guessing this line will be one of the last to finish.

Ahh the joys of election years. The candidates could care less where the rail line goes, but one is just opposing it to get elected. How cheap can we be.

I have seen the signs on wheeler, and have been checking out the newspaper comments and posts against the rail. It's a real shame that people have to be so selfish for their one little inconvenience. For a city that can be so positive, light rail has been terribly opposed and held up here.

Edited by totheskies
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After 64 pages of commentary, can someone answer the following questions for me?

1. Has the alignment for this line been determined yet?

2. Has a date certain been announced for the groundbreaking of this line?

1. Yes

2. Not before our flying cars can take us places instead..............but on a serious note, this is getting ridiculous. Operationlly before 2012?? Ha..yeah right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, high land prices not only forbid low-density development, but in this case they act to ration land only to those developers that can pull off very-high-density developments. But the higher the density, the greater the cost to build each unit. That means that only very wealthy people can afford it, and since Main Street is a high-crime corridor through Midtown, and since wealthy folks pretty much can decide to live anywhere throughout the region, it really narrows down the pool of prospective residents that is available for a redevelopment of Main Street.

So the land prices are high because of light rail, but developers can't do pricey developments because of all the crime. But why doesn't the crime lower the land prices?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the land prices are high because of light rail, but developers can't do pricey developments because of all the crime. But why doesn't the crime lower the land prices?

I suspect that relative land pricing throughout Midtown are justified, and is just acting to prevent the under-development of Main Street until the surrounding area has developed more of a critical mass (and also fewer competitive developable sites), at which point we might finally expect to see market support for high density along Main--with or without the crime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the land prices are high because of light rail, but developers can't do pricey developments because of all the crime. But why doesn't the crime lower the land prices?

prices are high, however crime isn't a deterrent but the ability to make a buck is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

This line is only featured on the news when there's some sort of controversy, so coverage is patchy at best. Would some knowledgeable person pass on any information as to when there might be a prospect of breaking ground on this line? I would appreciate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This line is only featured on the news when there's some sort of controversy, so coverage is patchy at best. Would some knowledgeable person pass on any information as to when there might be a prospect of breaking ground on this line? I would appreciate it.

I don't believe that METRO is internally knowledgable enough that anybody that think that they knows anything can be counted as a reliable source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This line is only featured on the news when there's some sort of controversy, so coverage is patchy at best. Would some knowledgeable person pass on any information as to when there might be a prospect of breaking ground on this line? I would appreciate it.

METRO doesn't even know. CDeb usually has the latest from the engineering side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe that METRO is internally knowledgeable enough that anybody that think that they knows anything can be counted as a reliable source.

Believe me, getting information from Metro is like pulling teeth and I talk to a number of people that are involved in MetroRail. They have been rather vague on a number of questions I've asked, but for the sake of propriety I have to let it go and do what I do. Believe me, I grind my teeth every time I go there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This line is only featured on the news when there's some sort of controversy, so coverage is patchy at best. Would some knowledgeable person pass on any information as to when there might be a prospect of breaking ground on this line? I would appreciate it.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say sometime in 2009

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...