Guest Marty Posted September 15, 2006 Share Posted September 15, 2006 (edited) Dog, Tim and Lealand might be exordicted to Mexico, but they never give us all the cop killers hanging out in that 3 world nation. This is going back to the arrest of the Max Factor smuck in Mexico for date rape. Edited September 16, 2006 by Marty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted September 15, 2006 Share Posted September 15, 2006 Dog, Tim and Leeland might exordicted to Mexico, but they never give us all the cop killers hanging out in that 3 world nation. This is going back to the arrest of the Max Factor smuck in Mexico for date rape. In what combination are you smoking, dropping, shooting, and snorting which substances? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Marty Posted September 15, 2006 Share Posted September 15, 2006 In what combination are you smoking, dropping, shooting, and snorting which substances? Beer, beer and more beer and if theres time more beer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJones Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 Marty,they aren't gonna extradite Dog, it was a simple failure to appear, and he will get his bond reinstated. Don't worry Marty, they won't be cancelling the show over this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Marty Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 (edited) Marty,they aren't gonna extradite Dog, it was a simple failure to appear, and he will get his bond reinstated. Don't worry Marty, they won't be cancelling the show over this. That's a good deal braa Edited September 16, 2006 by Marty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 Marty,they aren't gonna extradite Dog, it was a simple failure to appear, and he will get his bond reinstated. Don't worry Marty, they won't be cancelling the show over this.I am a bit curious why the US authorities would arrest someone on a Mexican arrest warrant if they had no intention of "exordicting" (sic) him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmainguy Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 I am a bit curious why the US authorities would arrest someone on a Mexican arrest warrant if they had no intention of "exordicting" (sic) him.Do we have a treaty with Mexico regarding extradition in a case such as this? If we do, can we just ignore it or do we have to turn them over? (...not that the rule of law has little to do with today's reality...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark F. Barnes Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 Do we have a treaty with Mexico regarding extradition in a case such as this? If we do, can we just ignore it or do we have to turn them over? (...not that the rule of law has little to do with today's reality...)I have found two lists online, and they are very similar. You cancompare them with the lists of countries the USA does have extraditiontreaties with:http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/3181.notes.htmlhttp://resource.lawlinks.com/Content/Legal...itle_18_209.htm"Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan,Botswana, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, CapeVerde, Central African Republic, Chad, China, Comoros, Djibouti,Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Indonesia,Iran, Ivory Coast, Jordan, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Madagascar,Mali, Maldives, Mauritania, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Nepal,Niger, Oman, Philippines, Qatar, Rwanda, Samoa, Sao Tome e Principe,Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda,USSR, United Arab Emirates, Vanuatu, Vietnam, Yemen, Yemen South,Zaire & Zimbabwe"Taken from "Extradition, US drug policy and the erosion of individualliberties" by Howard Markshttp://www.drugtext.org/articles/912612.htm"Countries which do not have extradition treaties but do maintaindiplomatic relations with the US are Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia,Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bophuthatswana, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burundi,Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, China (People'sRepublic of China), Ciskei, The Comors, Cote d' Ivoire, Djibouti,Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia,Jordan, Korea (South), Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Madagascar, Mali,Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Maldova, Mongolia,Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Philippines,Principe and San Tome, Qatar, Russian Federation, Rwanda, SaudiArabia, Senegal, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Western Samoa,Yemen, Zaire, and Zimbabwe.Countries which have neither diplomatic relations nor extraditiontreaties with the US are Andorra, Angola, Bantu Homelands, Bhutan,Bosnia, Cambodia, Ciskei, Cuba, Iran, Korea (North), Libya, Maldives,Serbia, Somalia, Taiwan, Transkei, Vanuatu, and Vietnam."Taken from page 17 of The Passport Reporthttp://www.blackmarket-press.com/articles/books/pr.pdfI hope this answers your question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Marty Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 (edited) Neither Country are bounded to give up it nationals, But Mexico don't give up it's national's if the death sentence is recommended. aka cop killers. Edited September 16, 2006 by Marty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrothead Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 Ya know, I understand it can be downright irritating to read a post with mispellings...but to point it out and mock it is beneath you guys. I see it a lot here. Not everyone is a stellar speller and not everyone understands the concept of spell check. Perhaps a gentle PM or just ignoring it would be more effective in a conversation? Would you correct the grammar of an acquaintance speaking to you? :\ KWIM? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJones Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 (edited) I am a bit curious why the US authorities would arrest someone on a Mexican arrest warrant if they had no intention of "exordicting" (sic) him. Well Red, the authorities involved forgot to contact a priest to help serve the warrant, so they are a little laxed on their police work, so Dog will walk. Edited September 16, 2006 by TJones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbigtex56 Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 I am a bit curious why the US authorities would arrest someone on a Mexican arrest warrant if they had no intention of "exordicting" (sic) him. 'sic' as a Dog? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.