lockmat Posted December 4, 2007 Share Posted December 4, 2007 (edited) Just curious, how will the Grand Parkway improve east/west traffic flow? For you, specifically?Right now it probably won't help going east, but going West it would help getting to Tomball much faster. Taking the backway on Woodlands pkwy takes about 35-40 mins and 2920 takes at least 20-25, depending on traffic.It would just be nice to get on a freeway when going east/west, even if for only a couple miles, instead of taking Woodlands pkwy, 2920 or 1960, even if that means I have to drive a few more miles north/south to get to it. Red lights are unpleasant.edit:this is straying even moer off topic, but wikipedia says this about 99: Located between George Bush Park and Katy, the highway will have the potential of becoming a major freeway for Katy residents traveling to George Bush Intercontinental Airport and other areas in north Houston.Living only about 20-30 mins from the airport, I never realized how much it must suck for people on the other sides of town to get to Bush. It's pretty far. Edited December 4, 2007 by lockmat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted December 4, 2007 Share Posted December 4, 2007 To add on...I really believe the hub-and-spoke freeway system works well for the most part. But when the "wheels" get much bigger out towards the burbs, the "spokes" also become very far apart. I know for sure that at least on this north side, we hurt for major "spokes" too. I'm not necessarily saying we need freeways to fulfill that need, but major roads like a 2920 w/ speed limits of at least 50/55 serving as spokes inbetween 45 and 249 could be a great benefit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pineda Posted December 4, 2007 Author Share Posted December 4, 2007 Grand Parkway Constructors are Williams Brothers Construction and Dannenbaum EngineeringA joint venture led by a road construction company and an engineering firm has asked Harris County to enter into a public-private partnership to build and operate the 197-mile Grand Parkway as a toll road.Commissioners Court will consider today whether it wants to study the unsolicited offer to undertake the $5.3 billion project to build an outermost ring skirting the metropolitan area.-snip-If the court decides to go ahead with a partnership between the county and Grand Parkway Constructors, the joint venture would need approval from the Texas Department of Transportation.Grand Parkway Constructors' principals are Williams Brothers Construction and Dannenbaum Engineering.Executives at both companies did not return calls Monday.-snip-The idea of a Grand Parkway encircling the metropolitan area outside Highway 6 has been around for decades. Critics long have contended that it is a highway sought by road builders and developers who intend to build subdivisions and strip malls in the still undeveloped areas.Regardless of one's stance in that debate, the Legislature and TxDOT have decided the Grand Parkway will be built.-snip-TxDOT officials hope to have agreed on a plan for building the Grand Parkway by the end of next year, Dennis said.First, the agency will negotiate with Harris, Fort Bend, Brazoria, Waller and Montgomery counties over potential toll rates on the road that will go through the five counties. That process should be completed by March, Dennis said.TxDOT then will ask the Houston-Galveston Area Council to approve tentative rates and future rate hikes.Based on that information, TxDOT will calculate the market value of the Grand Parkway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody_hawkeye Posted December 4, 2007 Share Posted December 4, 2007 Toll roads add to the problem of after-traffic planning and development. Funding is always an issue. But then when the traffic gets unbearable, somehow the funds just seem to be there. Maybe, just maybe the Grand Pkwy is ahead of the after-traffic development syndrome. But I can see how toll road funding could throw it back in time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfinke Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Houston Chronicle articleNew toll road being studied from Spring to 242 east of I45 and eventually all the way to Conroe as alternative to I45. Flyover on 242 at I45 to start construction in January. ''I was driving around the county this weekend and the traffic is horrible," Sadler said. "We need more roads in this county now."I like how Sadler thinks that more new roads are the only solution for aleviating traffic. God forbid we should provide transit alternatives to commuting by car, or worse still, encourage people to live near to where they work! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 ''I was driving around the county this weekend and the traffic is horrible," Sadler said. "We need more roads in this county now."I like how Sadler thinks that more new roads are the only solution for aleviating traffic. God forbid we should provide transit alternatives to commuting by car, or worse still, encourage people to live near to where they work!I'm not sure public transportation is really doable in The Woodlands. I mean, are buses gonna go pick people up at the front of their house or neigborhood? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody_hawkeye Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 (edited) I'm not sure public transportation is really doable in The Woodlands. I mean, are buses gonna go pick people up at the front of their house or neigborhood?My thinking is that pickup and dropoff are doable if we use neighborhood parks. Only to and from Town Center and/or other high density commercial areas, perhaps including Montgomery College which has a huge parking problem. Edited December 5, 2007 by woody_hawkeye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 My thinking is that pickup and dropoff are doable if we use neighborhood parks. Only to and from Town Center and/or other high density commercial areas, perhaps including Montgomery College which has a huge parking problem.Does each neighborhood have a park big enough to accomodate that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody_hawkeye Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 (edited) I guess it depends on expected use of the system, but when I go around to the big neighborhood parks, I see as many as 20-30 spaces just sitting there waiting to be occupied. Lots of pavement for little use. That may be different during prime park time on weekends. Edited December 6, 2007 by woody_hawkeye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfinke Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 I'm not sure public transportation is really doable in The Woodlands. I mean, are buses gonna go pick people up at the front of their house or neigborhood?I'll admit that public transportation wouldn't work very well in The Woodlands, other than the park-and-rides already in use, but other places in Montgomery County, like Conroe, could implement a transit system. Does anyone know if there is any work or research being done for such a system? The Woodlands isn't the only source of traffic in Montgomery County. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pineda Posted December 6, 2007 Author Share Posted December 6, 2007 I'll admit that public transportation wouldn't work very well in The Woodlands, other than the park-and-rides already in use, but other places in Montgomery County, like Conroe, could implement a transit system. Does anyone know if there is any work or research being done for such a system? The Woodlands isn't the only source of traffic in Montgomery County.Brazos Transit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 Brazos Transit Dude, your signature is jacked up! The very last comment about freeways not being needed was for NORTH/SOUTH routes. The Grand Parkway goes EAST/WEST. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasons Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 I don't quite get the pervasiveness of posts from people who used to live in TW and now live in Houston, or people who live in Houston that would never move up here. Why do they feel the need to post in TW forum about how much better they think life is outside of TW? Who are they trying to convince, and why? Is it some sort of inferiority complex? Is it some strange way of subconsciously justifying a move by trashing the old digs? I mean really, what's the point??We moved to TW area, Imperial Oaks to be specific, from Dallas (Frisco) in 2005 and couldn't be happier with our neighborhood. I wouldn't move into Houston for anything. For me, it's worth the 40-minute commute every day. Every second of it. And believe me, a Houstonian could argue until they are blue in the face about the virtues of living in "the city" and I STILL wouldn't give it a second thought, not in a million years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxman Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 I don't quite get the pervasiveness of posts from people who used to live in TW and now live in Houston, or people who live in Houston that would never move up here. Why do they feel the need to post in TW forum about how much better they think life is outside of TW? Who are they trying to convince, and why? Is it some sort of inferiority complex? Is it some strange way of subconsciously justifying a move by trashing the old digs? I mean really, what's the point??We moved to TW area, Imperial Oaks to be specific, from Dallas (Frisco) in 2005 and couldn't be happier with our neighborhood. I wouldn't move into Houston for anything. For me, it's worth the 40-minute commute every day. Every second of it. And believe me, a Houstonian could argue until they are blue in the face about the virtues of living in "the city" and I STILL wouldn't give it a second thought, not in a million years. MY THOUGHTS EXACTLY!!!! I live in Imperial Oaks by the way! Small world. I'm on Willow Creek Park. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfinke Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 This article talks about a park-and-ride bus route to Huntsville from The Woodlands. I didn't know that many people commuted in that direction.http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nb/woo...ws/5358492.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Impossible Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 This article talks about a park-and-ride bus route to Huntsville from The Woodlands. I didn't know that many people commuted in that direction.http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nb/woo...ws/5358492.htmlYeah, there's a university up here, sure enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody_hawkeye Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 This article talks about a park-and-ride bus route to Huntsville from The Woodlands. I didn't know that many people commuted in that direction.http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nb/woo...ws/5358492.htmlThat article apparently was a temporary one. Does not exist on Thursday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Native1 Posted December 14, 2007 Share Posted December 14, 2007 That article apparently was a temporary one. Does not exist on Thursday.The link still works...http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nb/woo...ws/5358492.htmlThe Woodlands newest Park & Ride is set to open a temporary commuter lot on Jan. 2, a response to an explosion in the number of area residents trading in their cars for buses in the last year.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody_hawkeye Posted December 14, 2007 Share Posted December 14, 2007 This article talks about a park-and-ride bus route to Huntsville from The Woodlands. I didn't know that many people commuted in that direction.http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nb/woo...ws/5358492.htmlA surprise to me too. Since the incoming Woodlands job commuting is growing significantly, that is probably the general area where some employees live. The stats were not given, but now I am wondering how many vans park here all day and return back to Houston in the evening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody_hawkeye Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Austin Stateman: many TXDOT projects being put on hold. Soon after, with so-called "lettings" for 2008 trimmed to $3.1 billion, TxDOT officials announced huge cuts in spending on right of way and project design, as well as a freeze on the start of many road projects that were ready to go. That sudden halt to projects got legislators' attention Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody_hawkeye Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 I got an update a couple of days ago in a meeting. I published it in the blog, There were a couple of fuzzy items, but I tried to capture everything I heard. I found a couple of surprises in the plans. These are plans for projects starting this year. Mobility Projects in The Woodlands 2008-09 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 road surface noise reductioni found this commentary on the subject. i read a japanese study on this issue as well. it seems that the maximum benefit is 2-8 db and road noise can be 40-47 db. i'm not sure how to put that in real terms. my home is about 125 feet from woodlands parkway. if i knew there would be a 20% decrease in noise, i'd be all for it. i'm not sure if a 5% decrease would be worth the expense.do you have other information on the subject? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody_hawkeye Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 road surface noise reductioni found this commentary on the subject. i read a japanese study on this issue as well. it seems that the maximum benefit is 2-8 db and road noise can be 40-47 db. i'm not sure how to put that in real terms. my home is about 125 feet from woodlands parkway. if i knew there would be a 20% decrease in noise, i'd be all for it. i'm not sure if a 5% decrease would be worth the expense.do you have other information on the subject?Yeah, I have quite a bit but not enough to brag on. The DB scale is logrithmic. A 6 DB reduction is 1/2 the volume. I suspect some of the road noise can be way up there. I have a noise meter that I am preparing to use to benchmark current noise levels. I hope to get out this week to make some measurements. I will measure min and max and average. I don't think my meter measures the median, which is the best measure. That would require a much more sophisticated meter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxman Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 (edited) I wish they'd consider a flyover at Rayford/Sawdust. The problem is it's so darn crowded in there. 45 could also use two or three more lanes...before things really get out of hand. Montgomery County is over 400,000 people now. That's a 40% jump since the 2000 census. We're to be over 1 million by 2020. I'm also for them removing the lights on Woodlands Pkwy...at least through Shadow Bend. I'm not sure how that could be done, but it sure would help out the traffic. Last but not least...COMMUTER RAIL. I'm all for it. What a great asset to The Woodlands and everybody in Montgomery County. Is that even an option? I know The Woodlands has rejected Metro service several times in the past. With that said, would Metro even consider a nothern line up this way? Edited June 2, 2008 by wxman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody_hawkeye Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 I wish they'd consider a flyover at Rayford/Sawdust. The problem is it's so darn crowded in there. 45 could also use two or three more lanes...before things really get out of hand. Montgomery County is over 400,000 people now. That's a 40% jump since the 2000 census. We're to be over 1 million by 2020. I'm also for them removing the lights on Woodlands Pkwy...at least through Shadow Bend. I'm not sure how that could be done, but it sure would help out the traffic. Last but not least...COMMUTER RAIL. I'm all for it. What a great asset to The Woodlands and everybody in Montgomery County. Is that even an option? I know The Woodlands has rejected Metro service several times in the past. With that said, would Metro even consider a nothern line up this way?Good points! To my knowledge it has not been discussed. The cost of these ventures is very high. I do believe new thinking is required. I have requested a meeting with Ed Chance but not yet received a reply. These are the subjects I plan to explore with him. We do not want higher speed on Woodlands Pkwy. It is very clear that the reason we hired a additional policing force was for the safety of our children and residents. The traffic lights should be able to be effectively timed if law enforcement will cooperate end enforce the law FOR traffic mobility instead of making it a technical objective. Safety is the goal but it needs to be expanded to mobility, not including higher speed but the actual speed limit. That means ticketing thode who speed to the next light and hosing up the signals, causing traffic to stop. I am for traffic movement as a unit, not for each individual car being moved as fast as possible. We also live here on either side of each major vehicle conduit and do not want the noise. It is already rediculous and by putting the noise at a higher elevation only spreads it our further, affecting more homes. I also believe we can improve the traffic flow through education. There are many folks here who seem to have no what they are doing. They are calling it driving, but many do it without a brain. Driving is not a machancial skill. It is a mental skill that controls the mechanics. No cell phone, No music plugged into the ears, not an automatic process. It requires proper attention to the road. Somewhere in the past generation, this has been lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricco67 Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 We do not want higher speed on Woodlands Pkwy. It is very clear that the reason we hired a additional policing force was for the safety of our children and residents.you let your kids on the woodland parkway?wow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 woody, will you post your findings when you get the chance? it will be interesting. also, if you'd like to measure near woodlands parkway & grogan's mill...........? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody_hawkeye Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 you let your kids on the woodland parkway?wow.Yep they are teenagers. We lost way too many of them earlier - to unenforced speeding. It was super serious! It was said there were more teenagers in the local cemetary than adults. It was the number one issue in this community a few short years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody_hawkeye Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 woody, will you post your findings when you get the chance? it will be interesting. also, if you'd like to measure near woodlands parkway & grogan's mill...........?What good timing. Turns out I need data now, so I took my first measurements today. I have to make the measurements on Gosling first. I will go wherever you want me to measure second. The technique has to be ironed out, but I am positioned to do a better job tomorrow. I got some noise from the wind today that interfered with the data collection. Still, I got some valuable info and a great start on the data. I will scout that section of road in the next day or so. You want Pkwy measurements or Grogan's Mill measurements? They will have different characteristics although I discovered today that the two surfaces where I measured did not change the readings hardly at all. The variances seem to be a function of tires more than anything. We shall see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted June 8, 2008 Share Posted June 8, 2008 woodlands parkway overpass at grogan's mill to be more specific. i never oversleep because the noise level goes up after 6:30am.keep us posted on your findings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.